Video recording is a vast industry, and many software programs have come to help this industry grow. In this text, we have two popular recording programs: Loom and Screencastify. How do both compare? Let’s discuss that in the Loom vs. Screencastify article.
Both Loom and Screencastify are web-based video recording and sharing programs. Both can be described as async video creation programs. Loom has additional sharing options, while Screencastify offers to draw while recording.
Screen and webcam
Both offer screen and webcam options, but Loom is more prominent because it automatically adds a camera section in the bottom left corner. With Screencastify, even after setting up the camera, you do not see the camera. The only time you use the camera is when you start the recording.
Related: Screencast-O-Matic vs. Screencastify
This is where Screencastify shines because it comes with drawing features during the recording screen. You get a pen, rectangle, stickers, and an eraser option.
Yes, being online video recorders, you get some analytics options. Loom shows the video engagement on the top of the video page. Under the count menu, the names are visible. But, if the other person has not logged in, you see “anonymous”.
Screencastify takes the same approach, but it has an additional option of permitting the video. There are three permissions:
- Inserting the name to play the video
- Specific emails only (users will need to sign in)
The analytics data shows names and emails, but if you set the permission to anyone, it displays “anonymous” like Loom. The free versions of both support trimming the videos.
Related: Screencast-O-Matic vs. Loom
Here are some of the options of Loom:
- It has a recording canvas for talks and stuff. You can change the background and add text to make it look nice.
- Loom supports transcribing videos for free.
- You can enable and disable comments, reactions, video downloading, and analytics features for viewers.
- The background removing option is available.
- Loom has an Android and iOS app.
- On websites such as Google Docs, you see a small icon to start the recording.
Here are the Screencastify features
- Videos can be opened from the extension menu, which is missing on Loom.
- Screencastify supports more downloading formats, including MP3 and GIF.
- Upload videos to YouTube from your account.
- The app can automatically save videos to your Google Drive.
Sharing plays a vital part in Loom vs. Screencastify comparison. Of course, you can share the link on Loom, but you can adjust the link settings.
The option to make the link public is available. You can also set it for the people in the workspace or add specific emails.
One unique thing about Loom is that video watchers get a share button on the page. Furthermore, you can share the video on any social platform except YouTube. Finally, an embed code is provided to embed the video to your website.
Screencastify also has the same link features mentioned in the above analytics section. It has a few additional options:
- Share to Remind
- QR Code
- Share to Google Classroom
- Share to Wakelet
Like Loom, you can embed the code to your website.
Video recording test
So I did a test; yes, I did. I recorded a video in both for about a minute to see which tool produced better quality while considering the video size. I did not find any differences in the quality, but the video recorded in Screencastify consumed more size even though it was 6 seconds less than Loom’s. Anyway, here are the results:
|Video length: 1 minute||54 seconds|
|Size: 14.6 MB||7.27 MB|
Loom has more sign-in options than Screencastify. Along with the email, you can sign up using your Slack, Google, Apple, or Outlook account. Screencastify only supports Google sign-in, which is a downside for users who don’t use Google services.
Both can work with tools like Zoom, but at the same time, you can replace Zoom with one of those. Check out the Zoom and Loom comparison.
Of course, both are free, but Loom gives access to the last 25 videos. The rest of the videos are still there, but you need a paid plan to access those. Loom free has many other options, including:
- Screen and webcam recording
- 50 creators lite accounts (50 accounts with limited options)
- Viewer insights (video analytics)
- Team workspace
- Privacy features (video password protection)
Its first premium subscription focused on the teams costs $10 per month ($8 per month annually). On this plan, we get to:
- No recording limit
- Up to 50 creators
- Closed caption features
- Filler word removal
- Custom branding
- Engagement insights
The final plan is Enterprise for larger teams offering SSO, activity log, and advanced privacy options.
Screencastify takes a different approach. It has three plans, each offering a free and a paid subscription. Below is the list:
The Record and Edit target video editors, while Submit is used to get video submissions from company people and students. It does not offer to record, and you don’t need the extension for it to subscribe. The Record and Submit limit the recording to 5 minutes. Some of the features of the Record plan are:
- Screen and webcam support
- Autosave videos to Google Drive
- Export and video, GIF, and audio
- Trim videos
- Full HD recording
- Annotation features (drawing)
To record without the limit, you must pay $49 per year. The Edit plan brings the full recording capabilities, but you can’t export more than five minutes of videos.
- Merge clips
- Crop recordings
To get the full export features, you must pay for a premium Edit subscription, $49 per year.
Education plans are available on both sites. Loom makes it easier for teachers and students to sign up for free and enjoy the extended benefits, including a 45-minute recording limit. Screencastofy reduces the price of Record and Edit to $29 per year and Submit to $49 per year.
Loom vs. Screencastify: Links
There are many online and offline screen recording software, and Loom and Screencastify are two of the most common. If the article Loom vs. Screencastify helped, please let me know in the comments and subscribe to the newsletter to stay in touch.